If I’m being completely honest, Charlie Hunnam has never been my go-to crush. I think he’s perfectly attractive/beautiful/sexy, but my crushes were always Michael Fassbender, Benedict Cumberbatch and Tom Hardy. But I might have to give Charlie a thorough double-take because OMG!!!!!!! Charlie covers the new issue of Entertainment Weekly to do a “first look” at Guy Ritchie’s King Arthur movie. Ritchie says about Hunnam and the project:
“I think where the pitfall has often been is trying to make King Arthur bland and nice, and nice and bland. The two qualities make rather compatible bed companions. Unfortunately, they’re not interesting to watch. Luke Skywalker was always the most uninteresting character in Star Wars because he’s the good guy. Good guys are boring.”
I fundamentally disagree that good guys are boring, but I’ll also admit that if I saw this dirtied-up Charlie Hunnam on the street, I would jump him. HARD. Charlie tells EW that his Arthur is “a little bit rough around the edges, but he’s basically a survivor. He’s a hustler. He’s a street kid. There’s definitely a harder edge to him than people would imagine. It’s sort of classic Guy Ritchie stuff.” Blah. Just look at the photos.
Via @EW #KingArthur #CharlieHunnam pic.twitter.com/i20tIVdDHu
— Charlie Hunnam Daily (@HunnamDaily) July 23, 2015
Photos courtesy of Entertainment Weekly.
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7pLHLnpmirJOdxm%2BvzqZmbWtobYVxe8KhmKukmZqsqcHNp5iml5SesaCtvqCmq5%2BVpMK0q8%2Bhpq2no528sMC%2BsKCtoI%2BaxKDDzq6jnZeppMKgtMitlqKsXw%3D%3D